@article{luhmannDigitalHumanitiesDiscipline2022,
	title = {Digital humanities—{A} discipline in its own right? {An} analysis of the role and position of digital humanities in the academic landscape},
	volume = {73},
	issn = {2330-1635, 2330-1643},
	shorttitle = {Digital humanities—{A} discipline in its own right?},
	url = {https://asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.24533},
	doi = {10.1002/asi.24533},
	abstract = {Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as “a discipline in its own right” (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii–xxvii). Blackwell; 2004) and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines—first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2024-03-05},
	journal = {Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology},
	author = {Luhmann, Jan and Burghardt, Manuel},
	month = feb,
	year = {2022},
	pages = {148--171},
}

Although digital humanities (DH) has received a lot of attention in recent years, its status as “a discipline in its own right” (Schreibman et al., A companion to digital humanities (pp. xxiii–xxvii). Blackwell; 2004) and its position in the overall academic landscape are still being negotiated. While there are countless essays and opinion pieces that debate the status of DH, little research has been dedicated to exploring the field in a systematic and empirical way (Poole, Journal of Documentation; 2017:73). This study aims to contribute to the existing research gap by comparing articles published over the past three decades in three established English-language DH journals (Computers and the Humanities, Literary and Linguistic Computing, Digital Humanities Quarterly) with research articles from journals in 15 other academic disciplines (corpus size: 34,041 articles; 299 million tokens). As a method of analysis, we use latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling, combined with recent approaches that aggregate topic models by means of hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Our findings indicate that DH is simultaneously a discipline in its own right and a highly interdisciplinary field, with many connecting factors to neighboring disciplines—first and foremost, computational linguistics, and information science. Detailed descriptive analyses shed some light on the diachronic development of DH and also highlight topics that are characteristic for DH.

@misc{noauthor_about_2022,
	title = {About the {Programming} {Historian}},
	url = {https://programminghistorian.org/en/about},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2022-03-21},
	journal = {Programming Historian},
	year = {2022},
}

@misc{mcmichael_evaluating_2022,
	title = {Evaluating {Digital} {Scholarship} for {Critical} {Thinking} in the {Undergraduate} {Classroom}},
	url = {https://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu/evaluating-digital-scholarship-for-critical-thinking-in-the-undergraduate-classroom/},
	language = {English},
	urldate = {2022-01-10},
	journal = {The Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy},
	author = {McMichael, A. L.},
	month = jan,
	year = {2022},
	keywords = {Assignments, Short Form Pieces},
}

@incollection{toth-czifra_10_2021,
	address = {Cambridge},
	series = {Digital {Humanities} {Series}},
	title = {10. {The} {Risk} of {Losing} the {Thick} {Description} : {Data} {Management} {Challenges} {Faced} by the {Arts} and {Humanities} in the {Evolving} {FAIRData} {Ecosystem1}},
	copyright = {CC BY 4.0},
	isbn = {979-10-365-6084-2},
	shorttitle = {10. {The} {Risk} of {Losing} the {Thick} {Description}},
	url = {http://books.openedition.org/obp/12064},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2022-01-12},
	booktitle = {Digital {Technology} and the {Practices} of {Humanities} {Research}},
	publisher = {Open Book Publishers},
	author = {Tóth-Czifra, Erzsébet},
	editor = {Edmond, Jennifer},
	month = jan,
	year = {2021},
	note = {Code: Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research},
	keywords = {digital age, digitisation, humanities, scholarly identity, scholarly publishing, scholarship, technology},
	pages = {235--266},
}

@book{kemman_trading_2021,
	title = {Trading {Zones} of {Digital} {History}},
	isbn = {978-3-11-068210-6},
	url = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110682106/html},
	abstract = {Digital history is commonly argued to be positioned between the traditionally historical and the computational or digital. By studying digital history collaborations and the establishment of the Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History, Kemman examines how digital history will impact historical scholarship. His analysis shows that digital history does not occupy a singular position between the digital and the historical. Instead, historians continuously move across this dimension, choosing or finding themselves in different positions as they construct different trading zones through cross-disciplinary engagement, negotiation of research goals and individual interests.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-09-23},
	publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
	author = {Kemman, Max},
	month = oct,
	year = {2021},
	doi = {10.1515/9783110682106},
	note = {Publication Title: Trading Zones of Digital History},
	keywords = {Computertechnologie, Datenmanagement, Digital History},
}

Digital history is commonly argued to be positioned between the traditionally historical and the computational or digital. By studying digital history collaborations and the establishment of the Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History, Kemman examines how digital history will impact historical scholarship. His analysis shows that digital history does not occupy a singular position between the digital and the historical. Instead, historians continuously move across this dimension, choosing or finding themselves in different positions as they construct different trading zones through cross-disciplinary engagement, negotiation of research goals and individual interests.

@book{kim_alternative_2021,
	edition = {1},
	title = {Alternative {Historiographies} of the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-1-953035-58-5},
	url = {https://punctumbooks.com/titles/alternative-histories-of-the-digital-humanities/},
	abstract = {In Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History, Michel-Rolph Trouillot writes that by examining the process of history we can “discover the differential exercise of power that makes some narratives possible and silences others.” Alternative Historiographies of the Digital Humanities examines the process of history in the narrative of the digital humanities and deconstructs its history as a straight line from the beginnings of humanities computing. By discussing alternatives histories of the digital humanities that address queer gaming, feminist game studies praxis, Cold War military-industrial complex computation, the creation of the environmental humanities, monolingual discontent in DH, the hidden history of DH in English studies, radical media praxis, cultural studies and DH, indigenous futurities, Pacific Rim postcolonial DH, the issue of scale and DH, the radical, indigenous, feminist histories of the digital database, and the possibilities for an antifascist DH, this collection hopes to re-set discussions of the straight, white origin myths of DH. Thus, this collection hopes to reexamine the silences in such a straight and white masculinist history and delineates how power comes into play to shape this straight, white DH narrative.  A number of the pieces in this volume go back to the origin myth of the digital humanities to reassess the hagiography of Father Busa by reconsidering and recontextualizing his legacy and his work in relation to media archaeology, politics, Cold War maneuvers, mechanized genocide, the Third Reich, and the military-industrial complex as it has organized various fields, including Asian Studies. This reassessment of comparative genealogies — vis-à-vis Foucault — undergirds an alternative history of the Jesuit hagiography we have so far been unwilling to reexamine for its narrative use in embellishing an origin hagiography/historiography for digital humanities. Other pieces intertwine the digital humanities with other fields — area studies, Asian American Studies, cultural studies, literary studies, and environmental studies — in order to reexamine how the intersections and juxtapositions reveal silences in these histories. And finally, a number of pieces considers alternative praxes in rethinking these histories, whether it is an essay that is a game or a reevaluation of feminist media praxis.},
	urldate = {2021-06-27},
	publisher = {punctum books},
	editor = {Kim, Dorothy and Koh, Adeline},
	month = jun,
	year = {2021},
	doi = {10.53288/0274.1.00},
}

In Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History, Michel-Rolph Trouillot writes that by examining the process of history we can “discover the differential exercise of power that makes some narratives possible and silences others.” Alternative Historiographies of the Digital Humanities examines the process of history in the narrative of the digital humanities and deconstructs its history as a straight line from the beginnings of humanities computing. By discussing alternatives histories of the digital humanities that address queer gaming, feminist game studies praxis, Cold War military-industrial complex computation, the creation of the environmental humanities, monolingual discontent in DH, the hidden history of DH in English studies, radical media praxis, cultural studies and DH, indigenous futurities, Pacific Rim postcolonial DH, the issue of scale and DH, the radical, indigenous, feminist histories of the digital database, and the possibilities for an antifascist DH, this collection hopes to re-set discussions of the straight, white origin myths of DH. Thus, this collection hopes to reexamine the silences in such a straight and white masculinist history and delineates how power comes into play to shape this straight, white DH narrative. A number of the pieces in this volume go back to the origin myth of the digital humanities to reassess the hagiography of Father Busa by reconsidering and recontextualizing his legacy and his work in relation to media archaeology, politics, Cold War maneuvers, mechanized genocide, the Third Reich, and the military-industrial complex as it has organized various fields, including Asian Studies. This reassessment of comparative genealogies — vis-à-vis Foucault — undergirds an alternative history of the Jesuit hagiography we have so far been unwilling to reexamine for its narrative use in embellishing an origin hagiography/historiography for digital humanities. Other pieces intertwine the digital humanities with other fields — area studies, Asian American Studies, cultural studies, literary studies, and environmental studies — in order to reexamine how the intersections and juxtapositions reveal silences in these histories. And finally, a number of pieces considers alternative praxes in rethinking these histories, whether it is an essay that is a game or a reevaluation of feminist media praxis.

@article{moravec_digital_2021,
	title = {Digital {Historical} {Practices}},
	volume = {33},
	issn = {1527-2036},
	url = {https://muse.jhu.edu/article/794320},
	doi = {10.1353/jowh.2021.0019},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2021-06-15},
	journal = {Journal of Women's History},
	author = {Moravec, Michelle},
	year = {2021},
	note = {Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press},
	pages = {163--167},
}

@book{lauer_lesen_2020,
	address = {Darmstadt},
	series = {Geisteswissenschaften im digitalen {Zeitalter}},
	title = {Lesen im digitalen {Zeitalter}},
	volume = {1},
	isbn = {978-3-534-26854-2},
	language = {ger},
	publisher = {wbg Academic},
	author = {Lauer, Gerhard},
	year = {2020},
	keywords = {Digitalisierung, Lesen, Neue Medien},
}

@book{murray_william_2020,
	address = {Iowa City},
	series = {The new {American} canon : the {Iowa} series in contemporary literature and culture},
	title = {William {Gibson} and the futures of contemporary culture},
	isbn = {978-1-60938-749-5},
	abstract = {"William Gibson is frequently described as one of the most influential writers of the past few decades, yet his oeuvre has only been studied partially and without full recognition of its implications for literature and culture beyond science fiction. It is high time, then, for a book that explores the significance and wide-ranging impact of Gibson's fiction. This book brings together emerging and established literary critics and exciting new voices in contemporary science fiction to discuss the importance of Gibson's work for recent literary and cultural history. In the 1970s and 80s, Gibson, the "Godfather of Cyberpunk," rejuvenated science fiction. In groundbreaking works such as Neuromancer (1984) that changed SF as we knew it, Gibson provided us with a language and imaginary through which it became possible to make sense of the newly emerging world of globalization and the digital and media age. Ever since, Gibson's reformulation of SF has provided us with not just with radically innovative visions of the future but indeed with trenchant analyses of our historical present and of the emergence and exhaustion of possible futures. The essays collected in this book therefore not only trace the influence of Gibson's work on literature and culture over the past four decades, but they also illustrate how Gibson's work helps us understand the historical development of recent culture, such as the transition from the rise of cyberpunk to the new forms of realism that determine literary culture of the 2000s and toward a new turn to SF in the context of the crises of futurity that define the contemporary moment. Understanding Gibson, this book shows, allows us to understand some of the most fundamental historical developments of recent literature and culture, and it thereby offers us new ways of interrogating and understanding our own time"--},
	publisher = {University of Iowa Press},
	editor = {Murray, Mitch R. and Nilges, Mathias},
	year = {2020},
	keywords = {Criticism and interpretation, Gibson, William, Influence, Literature and society},
}

"William Gibson is frequently described as one of the most influential writers of the past few decades, yet his oeuvre has only been studied partially and without full recognition of its implications for literature and culture beyond science fiction. It is high time, then, for a book that explores the significance and wide-ranging impact of Gibson's fiction. This book brings together emerging and established literary critics and exciting new voices in contemporary science fiction to discuss the importance of Gibson's work for recent literary and cultural history. In the 1970s and 80s, Gibson, the "Godfather of Cyberpunk," rejuvenated science fiction. In groundbreaking works such as Neuromancer (1984) that changed SF as we knew it, Gibson provided us with a language and imaginary through which it became possible to make sense of the newly emerging world of globalization and the digital and media age. Ever since, Gibson's reformulation of SF has provided us with not just with radically innovative visions of the future but indeed with trenchant analyses of our historical present and of the emergence and exhaustion of possible futures. The essays collected in this book therefore not only trace the influence of Gibson's work on literature and culture over the past four decades, but they also illustrate how Gibson's work helps us understand the historical development of recent culture, such as the transition from the rise of cyberpunk to the new forms of realism that determine literary culture of the 2000s and toward a new turn to SF in the context of the crises of futurity that define the contemporary moment. Understanding Gibson, this book shows, allows us to understand some of the most fundamental historical developments of recent literature and culture, and it thereby offers us new ways of interrogating and understanding our own time"–

@book{schruhl_formationen_2020,
	address = {Göttingen},
	series = {Digilit},
	title = {Formationen der {Praxis}: {Studien} zu {Darstellungsformen} von {Digital} {Humanities} und {Literaturwissenschaft}},
	isbn = {978-3-8471-1095-8},
	shorttitle = {Formationen der {Praxis}},
	number = {Band 2},
	publisher = {V\&R unipress},
	author = {Schruhl, Friederike},
	year = {2020},
}

@article{hodel_perspektivenwechsel_2020,
	title = {Perspektivenwechsel: {Zwei} {Disziplinen} aus {Sicht} der {Digital} {Humanities} − oder wie sich die {Geisteswissenschaften} im {Digitalen} (selbst) finden},
	volume = {77},
	copyright = {info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess},
	issn = {0044-3476},
	shorttitle = {Perspektivenwechsel},
	url = {https://boris.unibe.ch/147227/},
	abstract = {Die Digital Humanities sind noch immer ein relativ junges Forschungsfeld, das sich zwischen den geisteswissenschaftlichen Disziplinen und der Informatik bewegt. Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, wie die Digital Humanities mit Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte interagieren und wie das produktive Potenzial der digitalen Ansätze für beide Disziplinen ausgelotet werden kann. Dabei wird auch die Frage nach der Definition der Digital Humanities gestellt, die umstritten bleibt, wobei mein Vorschlag die Gemeinsamkeit in praxis- bezogenen Anwendungen als Klammer herausarbeitet. Obwohl die Archäologie scheinbar näher an naturwissenschaftlichen Verfahren steht als etwa die Kunstgeschichte, lässt sich für beide Disziplinen aufzeigen, dass die Erzeugung von Daten und Modellen einen Diskussionsbedarf befeuert, der für die Deutung und das Selbstverständnis der Disziplinen genutzt werden kann. Digitale Ansätze dürfen daher weniger von aussen vorgegebene Neuerung sein, sondern müssen vielmehr kritisch ausgehandelten und gewachsenen Normen und Standards entsprechen.},
	language = {deu},
	number = {2 + 3},
	urldate = {2021-10-19},
	journal = {Zeitschrift für Schweizerische Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte ZAK},
	author = {Hodel, Tobias},
	year = {2020},
	note = {Num Pages: 10
Number: 2 + 3
Publisher: Schwegler},
	pages = {101--110},
}

Die Digital Humanities sind noch immer ein relativ junges Forschungsfeld, das sich zwischen den geisteswissenschaftlichen Disziplinen und der Informatik bewegt. Der Beitrag geht der Frage nach, wie die Digital Humanities mit Archäologie und Kunstgeschichte interagieren und wie das produktive Potenzial der digitalen Ansätze für beide Disziplinen ausgelotet werden kann. Dabei wird auch die Frage nach der Definition der Digital Humanities gestellt, die umstritten bleibt, wobei mein Vorschlag die Gemeinsamkeit in praxis- bezogenen Anwendungen als Klammer herausarbeitet. Obwohl die Archäologie scheinbar näher an naturwissenschaftlichen Verfahren steht als etwa die Kunstgeschichte, lässt sich für beide Disziplinen aufzeigen, dass die Erzeugung von Daten und Modellen einen Diskussionsbedarf befeuert, der für die Deutung und das Selbstverständnis der Disziplinen genutzt werden kann. Digitale Ansätze dürfen daher weniger von aussen vorgegebene Neuerung sein, sondern müssen vielmehr kritisch ausgehandelten und gewachsenen Normen und Standards entsprechen.

@book{noauthor_digital_2020,
	title = {Digital {Methods} in the {Humanities}. {Challenges}, {Ideas}, {Perspectives}},
	volume = {1},
	isbn = {978-3-8376-5419-6},
	url = {https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2949410},
	abstract = {Digital Humanities is a transformational endeavor that not only changes the perception, storage, and interpretation of information but also of research processes and questions. It also prompts new ways of interdisciplinary communication between humanities scholars and computer scientists.
This volume offers a unique perspective on digital methods for and in the humanities. It comprises case studies from various fields to illustrate the challenge of matching existing textual research practices and digital tools.
Problems and solutions with and for training tools as well as the adjustment of research practices are presented and discussed with an interdisciplinary focus.},
	language = {eng},
	urldate = {2021-08-26},
	year = {2020},
	doi = {10/2949410},
}

Digital Humanities is a transformational endeavor that not only changes the perception, storage, and interpretation of information but also of research processes and questions. It also prompts new ways of interdisciplinary communication between humanities scholars and computer scientists. This volume offers a unique perspective on digital methods for and in the humanities. It comprises case studies from various fields to illustrate the challenge of matching existing textual research practices and digital tools. Problems and solutions with and for training tools as well as the adjustment of research practices are presented and discussed with an interdisciplinary focus.

@book{hovy_text_2020,
	edition = {1},
	title = {Text {Analysis} in {Python} for {Social} {Scientists}: {Discovery} and {Exploration}},
	isbn = {978-1-108-87335-2 978-1-108-81982-4},
	shorttitle = {Text {Analysis} in {Python} for {Social} {Scientists}},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108873352/type/element},
	urldate = {2021-06-01},
	publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
	author = {Hovy, Dirk},
	month = dec,
	year = {2020},
	doi = {10.1017/9781108873352},
}

@book{cro_integrating_2020,
	address = {Washington},
	title = {Integrating the digital humanities into the second language classroom: a practical guide},
	isbn = {978-1-62616-776-6},
	shorttitle = {Integrating the digital humanities into the second language classroom},
	abstract = {"This short book provides a practical overview of the utility and potential of a pedagogical approach informed by the theoretical framework of Digital Humanities (DH) pedagogy in the second language classroom; that is, a meaningful approach to language learning that is content-driven and task-based, collaborative, and communicative. Designed with the nonspecialist in mind to be an accessible introduction to DH pedagogy, this book will identify the pedagogical underpinnings of digital humanities and demonstrate how this method could be incorporated productively to enhance instruction and learning in the second language classroom at both the secondary and post-secondary levels. The book offers many examples of successful integrations of DH pedagogies. Each chapter includes discussion questions and a list of further reading, and the book concludes with a reference list that could help any interested scholar explore the field in more detail. Cro's book is to be a resource for language scholars in this burgeoning field"--},
	publisher = {Georgetown University Press},
	author = {Cro, Melinda A.},
	year = {2020},
}

"This short book provides a practical overview of the utility and potential of a pedagogical approach informed by the theoretical framework of Digital Humanities (DH) pedagogy in the second language classroom; that is, a meaningful approach to language learning that is content-driven and task-based, collaborative, and communicative. Designed with the nonspecialist in mind to be an accessible introduction to DH pedagogy, this book will identify the pedagogical underpinnings of digital humanities and demonstrate how this method could be incorporated productively to enhance instruction and learning in the second language classroom at both the secondary and post-secondary levels. The book offers many examples of successful integrations of DH pedagogies. Each chapter includes discussion questions and a list of further reading, and the book concludes with a reference list that could help any interested scholar explore the field in more detail. Cro's book is to be a resource for language scholars in this burgeoning field"–

@book{wilson_digital_2020,
	address = {Lanham, Maryland},
	title = {Digital humanities for librarians},
	isbn = {978-1-5381-1644-9 978-1-5381-1645-6},
	abstract = {"Digital Humanities For Librarians is a one-stop resource for librarians and LIS students working in this growing area of academic librarianship. The broad overview is followed by a series of intensely practical chapters answering questions with step-by-step approaches to both the digital and the human elements of Digital Humanities librarianship."--},
	publisher = {Rowman \& Littlefield},
	author = {Wilson, Emma Annette},
	year = {2020},
	keywords = {Academic libraries, Digital libraries, Effect of technological innovations on, Humanities, Information technology, Libraries, Library outreach programs, Metadata, Relations with faculty and curriculum, Study and teaching (Higher), Textbooks, United States},
}

"Digital Humanities For Librarians is a one-stop resource for librarians and LIS students working in this growing area of academic librarianship. The broad overview is followed by a series of intensely practical chapters answering questions with step-by-step approaches to both the digital and the human elements of Digital Humanities librarianship."–

@techreport{piotrowski_aint_2020,
	type = {preprint},
	title = {Ain’t {No} {Way} {Around} {It}: {Why} {We} {Need} to {Be} {Clear} {About} {What} {We} {Mean} by “{Digital} {Humanities}”},
	shorttitle = {Ain’t {No} {Way} {Around} {It}},
	url = {https://osf.io/d2kb6},
	abstract = {Digital humanities (DH) has gained the dubious reputation of struggling to define itself.  Articles trying to define DH have become something of a genre—however, more often than not the conclusions boil down to “DH is undefinable” or even “DH must not be defined.”  A question that is rarely addressed, though, is *why* DH is supposedly undefinable.  In this paper we argue that this is not because it would be, for example, particularly difficult to come up with a definition or because unlike most other fields, DH would not benefit from delimiting its domain, but rather because the majority of researchers that self-identify as “DH scholars” are actively opposing a definition.  This is due to the fact that they understand DH as “contemporary humanities,” i.e., humanities using contemporary tools, not a new discipline.  While legitimate, this view is irreconcilable with the understanding of DH as the development and application of a new—computational—methodology in the humanities.  We therefore come to the conclusion that there is ultimately no way around clearly delimiting these two opposing views; we propose to use the term “computational humanities” to refer to the latter field, and we present a concise definition.},
	urldate = {2020-04-20},
	institution = {SocArXiv},
	author = {Piotrowski, Michael},
	month = apr,
	year = {2020},
	doi = {10.31235/osf.io/d2kb6},
}

Digital humanities (DH) has gained the dubious reputation of struggling to define itself. Articles trying to define DH have become something of a genre—however, more often than not the conclusions boil down to “DH is undefinable” or even “DH must not be defined.” A question that is rarely addressed, though, is *why* DH is supposedly undefinable. In this paper we argue that this is not because it would be, for example, particularly difficult to come up with a definition or because unlike most other fields, DH would not benefit from delimiting its domain, but rather because the majority of researchers that self-identify as “DH scholars” are actively opposing a definition. This is due to the fact that they understand DH as “contemporary humanities,” i.e., humanities using contemporary tools, not a new discipline. While legitimate, this view is irreconcilable with the understanding of DH as the development and application of a new—computational—methodology in the humanities. We therefore come to the conclusion that there is ultimately no way around clearly delimiting these two opposing views; we propose to use the term “computational humanities” to refer to the latter field, and we present a concise definition.

@book{nyhan_one_2019,
	edition = {1st ed. 2019 Edition},
	title = {One {Origin} of {Digital} {Humanities}: {Fr} {Roberto} {Busa} in {His} {Own} {Words}},
	isbn = {978-3-030-18313-4},
	shorttitle = {One {Origin} of {Digital} {Humanities}},
	abstract = {This book gathers, and makes available in English, with new introductions, previously out of print or otherwise difficult to access articles by Fr Roberto Busa S.J. (1913 - 2011). Also included is a comprehensive bibliography of Busa, an oral history interview with Busa's translator, and a substantial new chapter that evaluates Busa's contributions and intellectual legacies. The result is a groundbreaking book that is of interest to digital humanists and computational linguists as well as historians of science, technology and the humanities. As the application of computing to cultural heritage becomes ever more ubiquitous, new possibilities for transmitting, shaping, understanding, questioning and even imagining the human record are opening up. Busa is considered by many to be among the pioneers in this field, and his research on projects like the Index Thomisticus is one of the earliest known examples of a humanities project that incorporated automation; it continues to be widely cited and used today. Busa published more than 350 academic articles and shorter pieces in numerous languages, but despite the unquestionable importance of his early work for understanding the history and development of fields like humanities computing and computational linguistics, a large part of his canon and thinking remained inaccessible or difficult to access until this book.},
	language = {Englisch},
	publisher = {Springer},
	author = {Nyhan, Julianne and Passarotti, Marco},
	month = nov,
	year = {2019},
}

This book gathers, and makes available in English, with new introductions, previously out of print or otherwise difficult to access articles by Fr Roberto Busa S.J. (1913 - 2011). Also included is a comprehensive bibliography of Busa, an oral history interview with Busa's translator, and a substantial new chapter that evaluates Busa's contributions and intellectual legacies. The result is a groundbreaking book that is of interest to digital humanists and computational linguists as well as historians of science, technology and the humanities. As the application of computing to cultural heritage becomes ever more ubiquitous, new possibilities for transmitting, shaping, understanding, questioning and even imagining the human record are opening up. Busa is considered by many to be among the pioneers in this field, and his research on projects like the Index Thomisticus is one of the earliest known examples of a humanities project that incorporated automation; it continues to be widely cited and used today. Busa published more than 350 academic articles and shorter pieces in numerous languages, but despite the unquestionable importance of his early work for understanding the history and development of fields like humanities computing and computational linguistics, a large part of his canon and thinking remained inaccessible or difficult to access until this book.

@article{sula_early_2019,
	title = {The early history of digital humanities: {An} analysis of {Computers} and the {Humanities} (1966–2004) and {Literary} and {Linguistic} {Computing} (1986–2004)},
	volume = {34},
	issn = {2055-7671},
	shorttitle = {The early history of digital humanities},
	url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz072},
	doi = {10.1093/llc/fqz072},
	abstract = {Most commentators locate the origin of digital humanities (DH) in computational text analysis of the mid-twentieth century, beginning in 1946 with Roberto Busa’s plans for the Index Thomisticus, a massive attempt to encode nearly 11 million words of Thomas Aquinas’ writings on IBM punch cards. This event (and the narrative that follows) is found throughout the literature, leading some to believe that early DH work ‘concentrated, perhaps somewhat narrowly, on text analysis (such as classification systems, mark-up, text encoding, and scholarly editing)’ (Presner, 2010, p. 6). Others seem convinced that DH is still only text analysis or too dominated by it (Meeks, 2013)—and misguided in its approach (Fish, 2012). Meanwhile, Underwood (2017) has recently made a case for disentangling distant reading methods from DH generally, noting that the former predates and does not depend on digital technology.This article presents an empirical perspective on the early history of DH by tracing publications in two foundational journals (Computers and the Humanities (CHum), established in 1966, and Literary and Linguistic Computing (LLC), established in 1986), with particular emphasis on media types, authors’ disciplines and locations, and teaching and learning. In doing so, we examine the extent to which early DH work focused on text analysis as well as broader trends in the early history of the field.},
	number = {Supplement\_1},
	urldate = {2021-12-04},
	journal = {Digital Scholarship in the Humanities},
	author = {Sula, Chris Alen and Hill, Heather V},
	month = dec,
	year = {2019},
	pages = {i190--i206},
}

Most commentators locate the origin of digital humanities (DH) in computational text analysis of the mid-twentieth century, beginning in 1946 with Roberto Busa’s plans for the Index Thomisticus, a massive attempt to encode nearly 11 million words of Thomas Aquinas’ writings on IBM punch cards. This event (and the narrative that follows) is found throughout the literature, leading some to believe that early DH work ‘concentrated, perhaps somewhat narrowly, on text analysis (such as classification systems, mark-up, text encoding, and scholarly editing)’ (Presner, 2010, p. 6). Others seem convinced that DH is still only text analysis or too dominated by it (Meeks, 2013)—and misguided in its approach (Fish, 2012). Meanwhile, Underwood (2017) has recently made a case for disentangling distant reading methods from DH generally, noting that the former predates and does not depend on digital technology.This article presents an empirical perspective on the early history of DH by tracing publications in two foundational journals (Computers and the Humanities (CHum), established in 1966, and Literary and Linguistic Computing (LLC), established in 1986), with particular emphasis on media types, authors’ disciplines and locations, and teaching and learning. In doing so, we examine the extent to which early DH work focused on text analysis as well as broader trends in the early history of the field.

@incollection{gold_dh_2019,
	title = {A {DH} {That} {Matters}},
	url = {https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-f2acf72c-a469-49d8-be35-67f9ac1e3a60/section/0cd11777-7d1b-4f2c-8fdf-4704e827c2c2},
	booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	author = {Gold, Matthew and Klein, Lauren},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {ix--xiv},
}

@incollection{noble_toward_2019,
	title = {Toward a {Critical} {Black} {Digital} {Humanities}},
	url = {https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-f2acf72c-a469-49d8-be35-67f9ac1e3a60/section/5aafe7fe-db7e-4ec1-935f-09d8028a2687},
	booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
	author = {Noble, Safiya Umoja},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {27--35},
}

@book{risam_new_2019,
	address = {Evanston, Illinois},
	title = {New digital worlds: {Postcolonial} digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy},
	isbn = {978-0-8101-3885-8},
	shorttitle = {New digital worlds},
	publisher = {Northwestern University Press},
	author = {Risam, Roopika},
	year = {2019},
}

@incollection{coltrain_can_2019,
	title = {Can {Video} {Games} {Be} {Humanities} {Scholarship}?},
	isbn = {978-1-5179-0693-1},
	url = {www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvg251hk.6},
	abstract = {Games, as Wittgenstein warned us, are not easily placed into categories (36). At this point, even cataloging general game mechanics is a fool’s errand; genres proliferate as fast as the gatekeepers of the App Store and the Steam platform can green-light them. Yet for all this growth, it is an easy matter to say what games are not. Games are not, in most departments, {\textless}em{\textgreater}humanistic scholarship{\textless}/em{\textgreater}.  This is not to say that there has been no cross-pollination between games and the humanities or that there are not already natural relationships between the two areas. It took some time before even},
	urldate = {2020-01-14},
	booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities} 2019},
	publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
	author = {COLTRAIN, JAMES and RAMSAY, STEPHEN},
	editor = {Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F.},
	year = {2019},
	pages = {36--45},
}

Games, as Wittgenstein warned us, are not easily placed into categories (36). At this point, even cataloging general game mechanics is a fool’s errand; genres proliferate as fast as the gatekeepers of the App Store and the Steam platform can green-light them. Yet for all this growth, it is an easy matter to say what games are not. Games are not, in most departments, \textlessem\textgreaterhumanistic scholarship\textless/em\textgreater. This is not to say that there has been no cross-pollination between games and the humanities or that there are not already natural relationships between the two areas. It took some time before even

@book{gold_debates_2019,
	title = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities} 2019},
	isbn = {978-1-4529-6166-8 978-1-5179-0693-1},
	url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctvg251hk},
	urldate = {2020-01-14},
	publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
	editor = {Gold, Matthew K. and Klein, Lauren F.},
	month = apr,
	year = {2019},
	doi = {10.5749/j.ctvg251hk},
}

@incollection{piotrowski_digital_2018,
	title = {Digital {Humanities}: {An} {Explication}},
	shorttitle = {Digital {Humanities}},
	url = {http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/17004},
	abstract = {The relationship between computer science and digital humanities and the potential contributions of computer science to digital humanities cannot be reasonably discussed without defining what we mean by “digital humanities.” With a view to enabling this important discussion, we propose a concise definition of digital humanities centered around the construction of formal models.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2018-10-08},
	booktitle = {{INF}-{DH}-2018},
	author = {Piotrowski, Michael},
	editor = {Burghard, Manuel and Müller-Birn, Claudia},
	year = {2018},
}

The relationship between computer science and digital humanities and the potential contributions of computer science to digital humanities cannot be reasonably discussed without defining what we mean by “digital humanities.” With a view to enabling this important discussion, we propose a concise definition of digital humanities centered around the construction of formal models.

@book{kim_disrupting_2018,
	title = {Disrupting the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-1-947447-72-1},
	publisher = {Punctum Books},
	author = {Kim, Dorothy and Stommel, Jesse},
	year = {2018},
}

@book{jannidis_digital_2017,
	address = {Heidelberg},
	title = {Digital {Humanities}: {Eine} {Einführung}},
	isbn = {978-3-476-02622-4},
	shorttitle = {Digital {Humanities}},
	abstract = {Computerbasierte Verfahren greifen in viele Bereiche der Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften ein und spielen eine zunehmende Rolle in der universitären Bildung. Dieser Band bietet eine fundierte Einführung in die grundlegenden Konzepte, Methoden und Werkzeuge der Digital Humanities. Sie präsentiert Grundlagen wie Digitalisierung, Aufbau von Datensammlungen, Datenmodellierung und XML. Darüber hinaus behandelt sie Anwendungsgebiete wie Digitale Edition, Information Retrieval, Netzwerkanalyse, Geographische Informationssysteme, Simulation ebenso weiterführende Aspekte wie die Rolle der Bibliotheken, Archive und Museen sowie rechtliche und ethische Fragen.},
	language = {ger},
	publisher = {JBMetzler Verlag},
	editor = {Jannidis, Fotis and Kohle, Hubertus and Rehbein, Malte},
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {ANALYSE DU CONTENU (STATISTIQUE MATHÉMATIQUE) 519.254,3, APPLICATIONS INFORMATIQUES EN SCIENCES DE L'ESPRIT 004*09*04, ARCHIVAGE ÉLECTRONIQUE 930.25,2, ARCHIVIERUNG, ELEKTRONISCHE ARCHIVIERUNG, ARCHIVING, ELECTRONIC ARCHIVING, Auszeichnungssprache, BENÜTZUNG UND STRUKTUR WISSENSCHAFTLICHER LITERATUR, BENÜTZUNG UND STRUKTUR WISSENSCHAFTLICHER LITERATUR (02*2*1), BOOKS/SCIENTIFIC BOOKS, BOOKS/TEXTBOOKS (DOCUMENT TYPE), Bildverarbeitung, BÜCHER/LEHRBÜCHER (DOKUMENTENTYP), BÜCHER/WISSENSCHAFTLICHE BÜCHER, COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES 004*09*04, COMPUTERANWENDUNGEN/GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN, COMPUTERANWENDUNGEN/SOZIAL- UND GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN, COMPUTERANWENDUNGEN/SOZIAL- UND GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN 004*09*04, COMPUTERANWENDUNGEN/SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTEN, CONTENT ANALYSIS (MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS) 519.254,3, DATA MODELS (INFORMATION SYSTEMS) 004*07*01*01, DATENMODELLE (INFORMATIONSSYSTEME), DATENMODELLE (INFORMATIONSSYSTEME) 004*07*01*01, DIGITALISATION (ARCHIVAGE ÉLECTRONIQUE), DIGITALISATION (ELECTRONIC ARCHIVING), DIGITALISIERUNG (ELEKTRONISCHE ARCHIVIERUNG), DIGITALIZATION (ELECTRONIC ARCHIVING), DONNÉES/MODÈLES DE DONNÉES (SYSTÈMES D'INFORMATION), Data visualisation, Digital Humanities, EINFÜHRUNG, LEHRBUCH (DOKUMENTENTYP), EINFÜHRUNGEN, LEHRBÜCHER (DOKUMENTENTYP), ELECTRONIC ARCHIVING 930.25,2, ELEKTRONISCHE ARCHIVIERUNG, ELEKTRONISCHE ARCHIVIERUNG 930.25,2, ENSEIGNEMENT/MANUELS POUR L'ENSEIGNEMENT (TYPE DE DOCUMENT), Einführung, FORSCHUNG/GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN, GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN/FORSCHUNG, GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG, GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG 009\%001.891, HUMANITIES RESEARCH 009\%001.891, Humanités numériques, INHALTSANALYSE (MATHEMATISCHE STATISTIK), INHALTSANALYSE (MATHEMATISCHE STATISTIK) 519.254,3, INTRODUCTION, TEXTBOOK (DOCUMENT TYPE), INTRODUCTIONS, TEXTBOOKS (DOCUMENT TYPE), Informationssystem, LEHRBUCH (DOKUMENTENTYP), LEHRBÜCHER (DOKUMENTENTYP), LEHRBÜCHER (DOKUMENTENTYP) (075), LITTÉRATURE SCIENTIFIQUE/USAGE ET STRUCTURE DE LA LITTÉRATURE SCIENTIFIQUE, LIVRE POUR L'ENSEIGNEMENT (TYPE DES DOCUMENT), LIVRES POUR L'ENSEIGNEMENT (TYPE DE DOCUMENT), LIVRES SCIENTIFIQUES, MANUEL POUR L'ENSEIGNEMENT (TYPE DES DOCUMENT), MANUELS POUR L'ENSEIGNEMENT (TYPE DE DOCUMENT) (075), MODELLE/DATENMODELLE (INFORMATIONSSYSTEME), MODELS/DATA MODELS (INFORMATION SYSTEMS), MODÈLES DE DONNÉES (SYSTÈMES D'INFORMATION) 004*07*01*01, Métadonnées, Numérisation, RECHERCHES DANS LES SCIENCES DE L'ESPRIT 009\%001.891, RESEARCH/HUMANITIES, SCIENCES DE L'ESPRIT/APPLICATIONS INFORMATIQUES EN SCIENCES DE L'ESPRIT, SCIENCES DE L'ESPRIT/RECHERCHES, SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE/USE AND STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, SCIENTIFIQUES/LITTÉRATURE, LIVRES SCIENTIFIQUES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES/COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, SOZIAL- UND GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN/COMPUTERANWENDUNGEN IN SOZIAL- UND GEISTESWISSENSCHAFTEN, Société numérique, Softwaresystem, TEXTBOOKS (DOCUMENT TYPE) (075), Textverarbeitung, USAGE ET STRUCTURE DE LA LITTÉRATURE SCIENTIFIQUE (02*2*1), USE AND STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE (02*2*1), WISSENSCHAFTLICHE LITERATUR/BENÜTZUNG UND STRUKTUR VON WISSENSCHAFTLICHER LITERATUR, World Wide Web, ÉLECTRONIQUE/ARCHIVAGE ÉLECTRONIQUE},
}

Computerbasierte Verfahren greifen in viele Bereiche der Geistes- und Kulturwissenschaften ein und spielen eine zunehmende Rolle in der universitären Bildung. Dieser Band bietet eine fundierte Einführung in die grundlegenden Konzepte, Methoden und Werkzeuge der Digital Humanities. Sie präsentiert Grundlagen wie Digitalisierung, Aufbau von Datensammlungen, Datenmodellierung und XML. Darüber hinaus behandelt sie Anwendungsgebiete wie Digitale Edition, Information Retrieval, Netzwerkanalyse, Geographische Informationssysteme, Simulation ebenso weiterführende Aspekte wie die Rolle der Bibliotheken, Archive und Museen sowie rechtliche und ethische Fragen.

@article{weingart_whats_2017,
	title = {What’s {Under} the {Big} {Tent}?: {A} {Study} of {ADHO} {Conference} {Abstracts}},
	volume = {7},
	copyright = {Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:    Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.  Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.  Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See  The Effect of Open Access ).  All third-party images reproduced on this journal are shared under Educational Fair Use. For more information on  Educational Fair Use , please see  this useful checklist prepared by Columbia University Libraries .   All copyright  of third-party content posted here for research purposes belongs to its original owners.  Unless otherwise stated all references to characters and comic art presented on this journal are ©, ® or ™ of their respective owners. No challenge to any owner’s rights is intended or should be inferred.},
	issn = {1918-3666},
	shorttitle = {What’s {Under} the {Big} {Tent}?},
	url = {http://www.digitalstudies.org/articles/10.16995/dscn.284/},
	doi = {10.16995/dscn.284},
	abstract = {Article: What’s Under the Big Tent?: A Study of ADHO Conference Abstracts},
	language = {en},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2021-06-01},
	journal = {Digital Studies/Le champ numérique},
	author = {Weingart, Scott B. and Eichmann-Kalwara, Nickoal},
	month = oct,
	year = {2017},
	note = {Number: 1
Publisher: Open Library of Humanities},
	pages = {6},
}

Article: What’s Under the Big Tent?: A Study of ADHO Conference Abstracts

@misc{weingart_teaching_2017,
	title = {Teaching {Yourself} to {Code} in {DH}},
	url = {http://scottbot.net/?p},
	language = {English},
	urldate = {2020-06-02},
	journal = {the scottbot irregular},
	author = {weingart, scott b},
	month = feb,
	year = {2017},
	keywords = {Uncategorized},
}

@article{juola_six_2017,
	title = {Six {Septembers}: {Mathematics} for the {Humanist}},
	shorttitle = {Six {Septembers}},
	url = {http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/55/},
	doi = {10.13014/K2D21VHX},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2020-01-14},
	journal = {Zea Books},
	author = {Juola, Patrick and Ramsay, Stephen},
	month = mar,
	year = {2017},
}

@book{kurz_digital_2016,
	address = {Wiesbaden},
	edition = {2. Auflage},
	series = {Lehrbuch},
	title = {Digital humanities: {Grundlagen} und {Technologien} für die {Praxis}},
	isbn = {978-3-658-11212-7},
	shorttitle = {Digital humanities},
	language = {ger},
	publisher = {Springer Vieweg},
	author = {Kurz, Susanne},
	year = {2016},
	keywords = {30 Soziologie, 519.76 Mathematische Semiotik, Mathematische Linguistik, Angewandte Informatik, Auszeichnungssprache, Automatische Bildverarbeitung, Automatische Textverarbeitung, Bildbearbeitung, Bilddatenverarbeitung, Bildverarbeitung, Computerunterstütztes Informationssystem, Datenverarbeitung Informationssystem, Digital Humanities, Digitale Bildverarbeitung, Digitale Geisteswissenschaften, Digitale Kulturwissenschaften, Dokumentationssystem Informationssystem, Elektronische Bildverarbeitung, Elektronische Textverarbeitung, Fachinformationssystem, Geisteswissenschaften, Image processing, Imageprocessing, Imaging, Informationssystem, Informationssysteme, Informationstechnik, Lehrbuch, Markup Language, Nachrichtensystem, Picture processing, Programmsystem, Softwaresystem, Text Encoding Initiative, Textauszeichnungssprache, Textverarbeitung, WWW, World Wide Web, XML},
}

@book{schreibman_new_2016,
	address = {Chichester West Sussex},
	series = {Blackwell companions to literature and culture},
	title = {A new companion to digital humanities},
	volume = {93},
	isbn = {978-1-118-68064-3},
	url = {http://sfx.metabib.ch/sfx_locater?sid=ALEPH:EBI01&genre=book&isbn=978-1-118-68060-5},
	language = {eng},
	urldate = {2018-10-17},
	publisher = {Wiley Blackwell},
	editor = {Schreibman, Susan},
	year = {2016},
	keywords = {Computerphilologie, Digital Humanities, Digitale Geisteswissenschaften, Digitale Kulturwissenschaften, Online-Ressource},
}

@article{guldi_leaving_2016,
	title = {Leaving {Behind} the {Yellow} {Submarine}},
	url = {http://bostonreview.net/education-opportunity-class-inequality/jo-guldi-leaving-behind-yellow-submarine},
	abstract = {Mentorship is how the humanities justify themselves.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2020-01-21},
	journal = {Boston Review},
	author = {Guldi, Jo},
	month = nov,
	year = {2016},
}

Mentorship is how the humanities justify themselves.

@book{hahn_dh-handbuch_2015,
	address = {Göttingen},
	title = {{DH}-{Handbuch} /{Version} 1.0},
	copyright = {https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de},
	isbn = {ISBN 978-3-7375-6818-0},
	url = {https://handbuch.tib.eu/w/DH-Handbuch},
	abstract = {Ziel dieses Buchs ist, einen konzentrierten Überblick über das Feld der Digital Humanities (DH) anzubieten. Für Einsteiger und mögliche AntragstellerInnen stellen sich häufig die folgenden Fragen:

    Was sind die Digital Humanities?
    Was sind relevante Forschungsfragen?
    Mithilfe welcher Tools lassen sich fachspezifische, aber auch fächerübergreifende Fragen beantworten?
    Was müssen Geisteswissenschaftler beim Umgang mit Daten beachten?
    Wie sehen erfolgreiche Projekte in den Digital Humanities aus? 

Neben Lösungswegen und Ressourcen zu typischen Fragen werden auch Projekte und Werkzeuge detailliert vorgestellt, um vorhandene Kenntnisse aufzufrischen und neue Aspekte der Digital Humanities kennenzulernen. Die Nähe zur fachwissenschaftlichen Praxis steht dabei im Vordergrund. Wir hoffen, mit diesem Handbuch auch Einsteigern die Digital Humanities nahebringen zu können und die Neugierde auf digitale Methoden und deren Möglichkeiten für die geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung zu wecken.},
	language = {de},
	publisher = {DARIAH-DE},
	author = {Hahn, Helene and Kalman, Tibor and Kolbmann, Wibke and Kollatz, Thomas and Neuschäfer, Steffen and Pielström, Steffen and Puhl, Johanna and Stiller, Juliane and Tonne, Danah},
	year = {2015},
	note = {pdf: http://bit.do/DH-Handbuch},
	keywords = {act\_Communicating, obj\_DigitalHumanities},
}

Ziel dieses Buchs ist, einen konzentrierten Überblick über das Feld der Digital Humanities (DH) anzubieten. Für Einsteiger und mögliche AntragstellerInnen stellen sich häufig die folgenden Fragen: Was sind die Digital Humanities? Was sind relevante Forschungsfragen? Mithilfe welcher Tools lassen sich fachspezifische, aber auch fächerübergreifende Fragen beantworten? Was müssen Geisteswissenschaftler beim Umgang mit Daten beachten? Wie sehen erfolgreiche Projekte in den Digital Humanities aus? Neben Lösungswegen und Ressourcen zu typischen Fragen werden auch Projekte und Werkzeuge detailliert vorgestellt, um vorhandene Kenntnisse aufzufrischen und neue Aspekte der Digital Humanities kennenzulernen. Die Nähe zur fachwissenschaftlichen Praxis steht dabei im Vordergrund. Wir hoffen, mit diesem Handbuch auch Einsteigern die Digital Humanities nahebringen zu können und die Neugierde auf digitale Methoden und deren Möglichkeiten für die geisteswissenschaftliche Forschung zu wecken.

@article{bailey_transformingdh_2015,
	title = {\#transform(ing){DH} {Writing} and {Research}: {An} {Autoethnography} of {Digital} {Humanities} and {Feminist} {Ethics}},
	volume = {9},
	url = {http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000209/000209.html},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Digital Humanities Quarterly},
	author = {Bailey, Moya},
	month = sep,
	year = {2015},
}

@book{pomerantz_metadata_2015,
	address = {London},
	title = {Metadata},
	isbn = {978-0-262-52851-1},
	language = {Englisch},
	publisher = {The MIT Press},
	author = {Pomerantz, Jeffrey},
	year = {2015},
}

@article{burghardt_informationswissenschaft_2015,
	title = {Informationswissenschaft und {Digital} {Humanities}},
	volume = {66},
	issn = {1619-4292},
	url = {https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/iwp-2015-0053/html},
	doi = {10.1515/iwp-2015-0053},
	abstract = {Der Artikel Informationswissenschaft und Digital Humanities wurde am 1. November 2015 in der Zeitschrift Information - Wissenschaft \& Praxis (Band 66, Heft 5-6) veröffentlicht.},
	language = {de},
	number = {5-6},
	urldate = {2021-02-23},
	journal = {Information - Wissenschaft \& Praxis},
	author = {Burghardt, Manuel and Wolff, Christian and Womser-Hacker, Christa},
	month = nov,
	year = {2015},
	note = {Publisher: De Gruyter Oldenbourg
Section: Information - Wissenschaft \& Praxis},
	pages = {287--294},
}

Der Artikel Informationswissenschaft und Digital Humanities wurde am 1. November 2015 in der Zeitschrift Information - Wissenschaft & Praxis (Band 66, Heft 5-6) veröffentlicht.

@article{jensen_linguistics_2014,
	title = {Linguistics in the digital humanities: (computational) corpus linguistics},
	volume = {30},
	issn = {1901-9726, 0900-9671},
	shorttitle = {Linguistics in the digital humanities},
	url = {https://tidsskrift.dk/mediekultur/article/view/15968},
	doi = {10.7146/mediekultur.v30i57.15968},
	abstract = {Corpus linguistics has been closely intertwined with digital technology since the introduction of university computer mainframes in the 1960s. Making use of both digitized data in the form of the language corpus and computational methods of analysis involving concordancers and statistics software, corpus linguistics arguably has a place in the digital humanities. Still, it remains obscure and fi gures only sporadically in the literature on the digital humanities. Th is article provides an overview of the main principles of corpus linguistics and the role of computer technology in relation to data and method and also off ers a bird's-eye view of the history of corpus linguistics with a focus on its intimate relationship with digital technology and how digital technology has impacted the very core of corpus linguistics and shaped the identity of the corpus linguist. Ultimately, the article is oriented towards an acknowledgment of corpus linguistics' alignment with the digital humanities.},
	number = {57},
	urldate = {2023-02-24},
	journal = {MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research},
	author = {Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard},
	month = dec,
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {automatic annotation, computational tools in linguistic analysis, concordancer, corpus linguistics, data in the humanities, digitization, method},
}

Corpus linguistics has been closely intertwined with digital technology since the introduction of university computer mainframes in the 1960s. Making use of both digitized data in the form of the language corpus and computational methods of analysis involving concordancers and statistics software, corpus linguistics arguably has a place in the digital humanities. Still, it remains obscure and fi gures only sporadically in the literature on the digital humanities. Th is article provides an overview of the main principles of corpus linguistics and the role of computer technology in relation to data and method and also off ers a bird's-eye view of the history of corpus linguistics with a focus on its intimate relationship with digital technology and how digital technology has impacted the very core of corpus linguistics and shaped the identity of the corpus linguist. Ultimately, the article is oriented towards an acknowledgment of corpus linguistics' alignment with the digital humanities.

@article{androutsopoulos_digital_2014,
	title = {Digital language practices in superdiversity: {Introduction}},
	volume = {4-5},
	issn = {22116958},
	shorttitle = {Digital language practices in superdiversity},
	url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221169581400021X},
	doi = {10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.002},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2023-02-24},
	journal = {Discourse, Context \& Media},
	author = {Androutsopoulos, Jannis and Juffermans, Kasper},
	month = jun,
	year = {2014},
	pages = {1--6},
}

@article{galina_what_2014,
	title = {What {Are} {The} {Digital} {Humanities}? (¿{Qué} son las humanidades digitales?, 2011)},
	url = {http://dayofdh2014.matrix.msu.edu/redhd/2014/04/08/what-are-the-digital-humanities/},
	language = {en},
	journal = {RedHD en Traducción},
	author = {Galina, Isabel},
	translator = {Thompson, Tim},
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {meta\_GiveOverview, obj\_DigitalHumanities},
}

@book{gitelman_raw_2013,
	address = {Cambridge  Mass.},
	series = {Infrastructures series},
	title = {"{Raw} {Data}" {Is} an {Oxymoron}},
	isbn = {978-0-262-51828-4},
	abstract = {Episodes in the history of data, from early modern math problems to today's inescapable “dataveillance,” that demonstrate the dependence of data on culture.
                We live in the era of Big Data, with storage and transmission capacity measured not just in terabytes but in petabytes (where peta- denotes a quadrillion, or a thousand trillion). Data collection is constant and even insidious, with every click and every “like” stored somewhere for something. This book reminds us that data is anything but “raw,” that we shouldn't think of data as a natural resource but as a cultural one that needs to be generated, protected, and interpreted. The book's essays describe eight episodes in the history of data from the predigital to the digital. Together they address such issues as the ways that different kinds of data and different domains of inquiry are mutually defining; how data are variously “cooked” in the processes of their collection and use; and conflicts over what can—or can't—be “reduced” to data. Contributors discuss the intellectual history of data as a concept; describe early financial modeling and some unusual sources for astronomical data; discover the prehistory of the database in newspaper clippings and index cards; and consider contemporary “dataveillance” of our online habits as well as the complexity of scientific data curation. 
                    Essay Authors
                    Geoffrey C. Bowker, Kevin R. Brine, Ellen Gruber Garvey, Lisa Gitelman, Steven J. Jackson, Virginia Jackson, Markus Krajewski, Mary Poovey, Rita Raley, David Ribes, Daniel Rosenberg, Matthew Stanley, Travis D. Williams},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-03-19},
	publisher = {MIT Press},
	editor = {Gitelman, Lisa},
	year = {2013},
	note = {Publisher: The MIT Press},
}

Episodes in the history of data, from early modern math problems to today's inescapable “dataveillance,” that demonstrate the dependence of data on culture. We live in the era of Big Data, with storage and transmission capacity measured not just in terabytes but in petabytes (where peta- denotes a quadrillion, or a thousand trillion). Data collection is constant and even insidious, with every click and every “like” stored somewhere for something. This book reminds us that data is anything but “raw,” that we shouldn't think of data as a natural resource but as a cultural one that needs to be generated, protected, and interpreted. The book's essays describe eight episodes in the history of data from the predigital to the digital. Together they address such issues as the ways that different kinds of data and different domains of inquiry are mutually defining; how data are variously “cooked” in the processes of their collection and use; and conflicts over what can—or can't—be “reduced” to data. Contributors discuss the intellectual history of data as a concept; describe early financial modeling and some unusual sources for astronomical data; discover the prehistory of the database in newspaper clippings and index cards; and consider contemporary “dataveillance” of our online habits as well as the complexity of scientific data curation. Essay Authors Geoffrey C. Bowker, Kevin R. Brine, Ellen Gruber Garvey, Lisa Gitelman, Steven J. Jackson, Virginia Jackson, Markus Krajewski, Mary Poovey, Rita Raley, David Ribes, Daniel Rosenberg, Matthew Stanley, Travis D. Williams

@book{terras_defining_2013,
	edition = {1. Edition},
	title = {Defining {Digital} {Humanities}: {A} {Reader}},
	isbn = {978-1-4094-6963-6},
	shorttitle = {Defining {Digital} {Humanities}},
	abstract = {This reader brings together the essential readings that have emerged in Digital Humanities. It provides a historical overview of how the term ‘Humanities Computing’ developed into the term ‘Digital Humanities’, and highlights core readings which explore the meaning, scope, and implementation of the field. To contextualize and frame each included reading, the editors and authors provide a commentary on the original piece. There is also an annotated bibliography of other material not included in the text to provide an essential list of reading in the discipline.},
	language = {Englisch},
	publisher = {Ashgate},
	author = {Terras, Melissa and Nyhan, Julianne and Vanhoutte, Edward},
	year = {2013},
}

This reader brings together the essential readings that have emerged in Digital Humanities. It provides a historical overview of how the term ‘Humanities Computing’ developed into the term ‘Digital Humanities’, and highlights core readings which explore the meaning, scope, and implementation of the field. To contextualize and frame each included reading, the editors and authors provide a commentary on the original piece. There is also an annotated bibliography of other material not included in the text to provide an essential list of reading in the discipline.

@book{steven_e_jones_emergence_2013,
	address = {711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017},
	title = {The {Emergence} of the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-0-203-09308-5},
	language = {Englisch},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	author = {{Steven E. Jones}},
	month = aug,
	year = {2013},
}

@incollection{warwick2012a,
	title = {Introduction},
	isbn = {978-1-85604-766-1},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/digital-humanities-in-practice/4BCAD84F87BA8BCB3E0010FB1BFC333A},
	abstract = {This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.},
	urldate = {2024-01-03},
	booktitle = {Digital {Humanities} in {Practice}},
	publisher = {Facet},
	author = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Nyhan, Julianne},
	editor = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Nyhan, Julianne},
	year = {2012},
	doi = {10.29085/9781856049054},
}

This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.

@book{warwick2012a,
	title = {Digital {Humanities} in {Practice}},
	isbn = {978-1-85604-766-1},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/digital-humanities-in-practice/4BCAD84F87BA8BCB3E0010FB1BFC333A},
	abstract = {This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.},
	urldate = {2024-01-03},
	publisher = {Facet},
	editor = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Nyhan, Julianne},
	year = {2012},
	doi = {10.29085/9781856049054},
}

This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.

@incollection{svensson_chapter_2012,
	address = {Minneapolis, Minnesota},
	title = {Chapter 4: {Beyond} the {Big} {Tent}},
	isbn = {978-0-8166-7794-8},
	shorttitle = {Beyond the {Big} {Tent}},
	url = {https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/38531431-5bd6-4eb1-95f5-fa49c025322d},
	abstract = {Start reading this text on Debates in the DH Manifold},
	language = {en-US},
	urldate = {2023-06-09},
	booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
	author = {Svensson, Patrik},
	editor = {Gold, Matthew K.},
	year = {2012},
}

Start reading this text on Debates in the DH Manifold

@book{matthew_k_gold_debates_2012,
	address = {Third Avenue South, Suite 290, Minneapolis},
	title = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-0-8166-7794-8},
	language = {Englisch},
	publisher = {University Of Minnesota Press},
	author = {Matthew K. Gold},
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {Digital media, EDUCATION / Educational Policy \& Reform / General, EDUCATION / Higher, Humanities, Study and teaching (Higher) Data processing, Technological innovations},
}

@article{zundert_if_2012,
	title = {If you build it, will we come? {Large} scale digital infrastructures as a dead end for {Digital} {Humanities}},
	volume = {37},
	issn = {0172-6404},
	shorttitle = {If you build it, will we come?},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.165-186},
	abstract = {"Programs aiming to develop large scale digital infrastructure for the humanities motivate this development mostly by the wish to leverage methodological innovation through digital and computational approaches. It is questionable, however, if large scale infrastructures are the right incubator model for bringing about such innovation. The necessary generalizations and standardizations, management and development processes that large infrastructures need to apply to cater to wholesale humanities are at odds with well-known aspects of innovation. Moreover, such generalizations dose off many possibilities for exploring new modeling and computing approaches. The author argues that methodological innovation and advancing the modeling of humanities data and heuristics is better served by flexible small-scale research focused development practices. It will also be shown that modeling highly specific distributed web services is a more promising avenue for sustainability of highly heterogeneous humanities digital data than standards enforcement and current encoding practices." (author's abstract)},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Historical Social Research},
	author = {Zundert, Joris van},
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {Digitalisierung, Forschung, Geisteswissenschaft, Heuristik, Infrastruktur, Innovation, Methodologie, Nachhaltigkeit, Paradoxie, Praxis, Standardisierung, Technologie, Workflow-Management, digitalization, heuristics, humanities, infrastructure, innovation, methodology, paradoxy, practice, research, standardization (meth.), sustainability, technology, workflow management},
	pages = {165--186},
}

"Programs aiming to develop large scale digital infrastructure for the humanities motivate this development mostly by the wish to leverage methodological innovation through digital and computational approaches. It is questionable, however, if large scale infrastructures are the right incubator model for bringing about such innovation. The necessary generalizations and standardizations, management and development processes that large infrastructures need to apply to cater to wholesale humanities are at odds with well-known aspects of innovation. Moreover, such generalizations dose off many possibilities for exploring new modeling and computing approaches. The author argues that methodological innovation and advancing the modeling of humanities data and heuristics is better served by flexible small-scale research focused development practices. It will also be shown that modeling highly specific distributed web services is a more promising avenue for sustainability of highly heterogeneous humanities digital data than standards enforcement and current encoding practices." (author's abstract)

@article{thaller_controversies_2012,
	title = {Controversies {Around} the {Digital} {Humanities}. {An} {Agenda}},
	volume = {37},
	issn = {0172-6404},
	shorttitle = {Controversies around the digital humanities},
	doi = {https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.7-23},
	abstract = {"Observations on the current stage of the Digital Humanities and their environment identify four dangers: (1) The focus on infrastructures for the Digital Humanities may obscure that research ultimately is driven by analytical methods and tools, not just by the provision of data or publishing tools. (2) Information technology can support the Humanities in many forms and national traditions. That textual analysis is much discussed right now, should not hide the view of a broader disciplinary field. (3) The mobile revolution looming may once again lead to a repetition of highly destructive processes observed at the PC and the internet revolutions. (4) The Digital Humanities may have to take a much stronger part in the development, not only the reception, of technology. - A series of concrete and controversial questions, which allow the discussion of some of these trends, is derived." (author's abstract)},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Historical Social Research},
	author = {Thaller, Manfred},
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {Arbeitsumgebung, Bibliothek, Computerlinguistik, Digitalisierung, Forschung, Geisteswissenschaft, Informationstechnologie, Informationsverarbeitung, Infrastruktur, Instrumentarium, Internet, Methode, Textanalyse, computational linguistics, digitalization, humanities, information processing, information technology, infrastructure, instruments, library, method, research, text analysis, work environment},
	pages = {7--23},
}

"Observations on the current stage of the Digital Humanities and their environment identify four dangers: (1) The focus on infrastructures for the Digital Humanities may obscure that research ultimately is driven by analytical methods and tools, not just by the provision of data or publishing tools. (2) Information technology can support the Humanities in many forms and national traditions. That textual analysis is much discussed right now, should not hide the view of a broader disciplinary field. (3) The mobile revolution looming may once again lead to a repetition of highly destructive processes observed at the PC and the internet revolutions. (4) The Digital Humanities may have to take a much stronger part in the development, not only the reception, of technology. - A series of concrete and controversial questions, which allow the discussion of some of these trends, is derived." (author's abstract)

@book{warwick_digital_2012,
	address = {London},
	edition = {1.},
	title = {Digital {Humanities} in {Practice}},
	isbn = {978-1-85604-766-1},
	url = {http://www.amazon.de/Digital-Humanities-Practice-Claire-Warwick/dp/1856047660},
	abstract = {This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.},
	language = {en},
	publisher = {Facet Publishing},
	editor = {Warwick, Claire and Terras, Melissa and Nyhan, Julianne},
	year = {2012},
	keywords = {X-CHECK, meta\_GiveOverview, obj\_DigitalHumanities},
}

This title offers a cutting-edge and comprehensive introduction to this vibrant and increasingly important global field drawing together a broad spectrum of disciplines. Each chapter interweaves the expert commentary of leading academics, analysis of current research and practice and several exciting international case studies, exploring the possibilities and challenges that occur when culture and digital technologies intersect. It covers key topics that include: social media and crowd sourcing; digital images and digitisation; 3D scanning and museums; studying users and readers; electronic text and corpora; archaeology and GIS; open access and online teaching of digital humanities; and, books, texts and digital editing. This is an essential practical guide for academics, researchers, librarians and professionals involved in the digital humanities. It will also be core reading for all humanities students and those taking courses in the digital humanities in particular.

@incollection{gold_developing_2012,
	title = {Developing {Things}: {Notes} toward an {Epistemology} of {Building} in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-0-8166-7794-8},
	shorttitle = {Developing {Things}},
	url = {http://minnesota.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.001.0001/upso-9780816677948-chapter-10},
	urldate = {2020-01-14},
	booktitle = {Debates in the {Digital} {Humanities}},
	publisher = {University of Minnesota Press},
	author = {Ramsay, Stephen and Rockwell, Geoffrey},
	editor = {Gold, Matthew K.},
	month = jan,
	year = {2012},
	doi = {10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0010},
	pages = {75--84},
}

@book{thurlow_digital_2011,
	title = {Digital {Discourse}: {Language} in the {New} {Media}},
	isbn = {978-0-19-979543-7},
	url = {https://academic.oup.com/book/1880},
	urldate = {2023-02-24},
	publisher = {Oxford University Press},
	author = {Thurlow, Crispin and Mroczek, Kristine},
	month = oct,
	year = {2011},
	doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001},
	doi = {10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.001.0001},
}

@article{svensson_landscape_2010,
	title = {The {Landscape} of {Digital} {Humanities}},
	volume = {4},
	url = {http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/4/1/000080/000080.html},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2011-08-30},
	journal = {Digital Humanities Quarterly},
	author = {Svensson, Patrik},
	year = {2010},
	note = {00000},
	keywords = {⛔ No DOI found, 🔍No DOI found},
}

@article{kirschenbaum_what_2010,
	title = {What {Is} {Digital} {Humanities} and {What}'s {It} {Doing} in {English} {Departments}?},
	url = {http://mkirschenbaum.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/kirschenbaum_ade150.pdf},
	abstract = {People who say that the last battles of the computer revolution in En
glish departments have been
fought and won don’t know what they’re talking about. If our current use of computers in En
glish
studies is marked by any common theme at all, it is experimentation at the most basic level. As a pro
-
fession, we are just learning how to live with computers, just beginning to integrate these machines
effectively into writing- and reading-
intensive courses, just starting to consider the implications of the
multilayered literacy associated with computers},
	language = {en},
	number = {150},
	journal = {ADE Bulletin},
	author = {Kirschenbaum, Matthew G.},
	year = {2010},
	keywords = {*****, meta\_GiveOverview, obj\_DigitalHumanities},
	pages = {(preprint)},
}

People who say that the last battles of the computer revolution in En glish departments have been fought and won don’t know what they’re talking about. If our current use of computers in En glish studies is marked by any common theme at all, it is experimentation at the most basic level. As a pro - fession, we are just learning how to live with computers, just beginning to integrate these machines effectively into writing- and reading- intensive courses, just starting to consider the implications of the multilayered literacy associated with computers

@book{cohen_digital_2006,
	address = {Philadelphia},
	title = {Digital history: a guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the {Web}},
	isbn = {978-0-8122-1923-4},
	shorttitle = {Digital history},
	url = {http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/index.php},
	publisher = {University of Pennsylvania Press},
	author = {Cohen, Daniel J. and Rosenzweig, Roy},
	year = {2006},
	keywords = {Computer network resources, Computer-assisted instruction, History, Internet, Methodology, Research},
}

@book{siemens_companion_2004,
	address = {Oxford},
	edition = {Hardcover},
	series = {Blackwell {Companions} to {Literature} and {Culture}},
	title = {A {Companion} to {Digital} {Humanities}},
	isbn = {978-1-4051-6806-9},
	url = {http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/},
	abstract = {This Companion offers a thorough, concise overview of the emerging field of humanities computing. Contains 37 original articles written by leaders in the field. Addresses the central concerns shared by those interested in the subject. Major sections focus on the experience of particular disciplines in applying computational methods to research problems; the basic principles of humanities computing; specific applications and methods; and production, dissemination and archiving. Accompanied by a website featuring supplementary materials, standard readings in the field and essays to be included in future editions of the Companion.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2010-05-17},
	publisher = {Blackwell Publishing Professional},
	editor = {Siemens, Ray and Unsworth, John and Schreibman, Susan},
	year = {2004},
	keywords = {*****, X-CHECK, act\_Publishing, meta\_GiveOverview, meta\_Theorizing, t\_Encoding},
}

This Companion offers a thorough, concise overview of the emerging field of humanities computing. Contains 37 original articles written by leaders in the field. Addresses the central concerns shared by those interested in the subject. Major sections focus on the experience of particular disciplines in applying computational methods to research problems; the basic principles of humanities computing; specific applications and methods; and production, dissemination and archiving. Accompanied by a website featuring supplementary materials, standard readings in the field and essays to be included in future editions of the Companion.

@article{milic_next_1966,
	title = {The {Next} {Step}},
	volume = {1},
	issn = {0010-4817},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/30199191},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2023-06-20},
	journal = {Computers and the Humanities},
	author = {Milic, Louis T.},
	year = {1966},
	note = {Publisher: Springer},
	pages = {3--6},
}

@book{Mounier,
	title = {Les humanités numériques. {Une} histoire critique},
	isbn = {978-2-7351-2255-4},
	shorttitle = {Les humanités numériques},
	url = {http://www.editions-msh.fr/livre/?GCOI=27351100065270},
	abstract = {Que sont les humanités numériques ?

D'abord une rencontre, au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Celle d'un prêtre jésuite soucieux d’analyser la Somme théologique de Thomas d’Aquin avec les ordinateurs d’IBM. Cette collaboration donnera naissance à ce qu’on appellera plus tard les humanités numériques.

Porteuses de l’histoire des technologies, marquée par le développement des technosciences et du complexe militaro-industriel, les humanités numériques conduisent à s’interroger en retour sur ce qui fait la spécificité des humanités. L’union des technologies numériques et des humanités conduit-elle à remettre en cause ce qui les dinstingue traditionnellement ? Le numérique pousse-t-il, par les méthodes et modèles qu’il permet de développer dans ce champ de recherche, à placer les humanités sous la domination de modèles scientifiques qui leur sont étrangers ?

Quels dangers ces approches comportent-elles, en particulier lorsqu’une part croissante des productions culturelles et des interactions sociales est désormais placée sous l’emprise de sociétés commerciales globalisées qui font un usage massif du numérique ?

Dans cet ouvrage, Pierre Mounier nous livre une histoire critique des humanités numériques et propose de redéfinir à la lumière de ces analyses le contrat moral que les humanités peuvent établir avec la société.},
	language = {Fr},
	author = {Mounier, Pierre},
	note = {00006 },
}

Que sont les humanités numériques ? D'abord une rencontre, au lendemain de la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Celle d'un prêtre jésuite soucieux d’analyser la Somme théologique de Thomas d’Aquin avec les ordinateurs d’IBM. Cette collaboration donnera naissance à ce qu’on appellera plus tard les humanités numériques. Porteuses de l’histoire des technologies, marquée par le développement des technosciences et du complexe militaro-industriel, les humanités numériques conduisent à s’interroger en retour sur ce qui fait la spécificité des humanités. L’union des technologies numériques et des humanités conduit-elle à remettre en cause ce qui les dinstingue traditionnellement ? Le numérique pousse-t-il, par les méthodes et modèles qu’il permet de développer dans ce champ de recherche, à placer les humanités sous la domination de modèles scientifiques qui leur sont étrangers ? Quels dangers ces approches comportent-elles, en particulier lorsqu’une part croissante des productions culturelles et des interactions sociales est désormais placée sous l’emprise de sociétés commerciales globalisées qui font un usage massif du numérique ? Dans cet ouvrage, Pierre Mounier nous livre une histoire critique des humanités numériques et propose de redéfinir à la lumière de ces analyses le contrat moral que les humanités peuvent établir avec la société.

@misc{noauthor_triple_nodate,
	title = {{TRIPLE}},
	url = {https://operas.hypotheses.org/projects/triple},
	abstract = {TRIPLE: The European discovery solution dedicated to SSH resources Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked interdisciplinary Exploration … More information will follow soon! … TRIPLE will help social sciences and humanities (SSH) research...},
	language = {en-US},
	urldate = {2021-06-01},
	journal = {OPERAS},
}

TRIPLE: The European discovery solution dedicated to SSH resources Transforming Research through Innovative Practices for Linked interdisciplinary Exploration … More information will follow soon! … TRIPLE will help social sciences and humanities (SSH) research...

@misc{noauthor_digital_nodate,
	title = {The {Digital} {Humanities} {Literacy} {Guidebook}},
	url = {https://cmu-lib.github.io/dhlg/},
	abstract = {The Digital Humanities Literacy Guidebook},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2020-06-02},
	journal = {What are Digital Humanities?},
	note = {Library Catalog: cmu-lib.github.io},
}

The Digital Humanities Literacy Guidebook

@article{schreibman_digital_nodate,
	title = {Digital {Humanities}: {Centres} and {Peripheries}},
	abstract = {Digitale Geisteswissenschaften: Zentren und Peripherien«. This paper explores a history of humanities computing over the past decade as embodied in or represented by A Companion to Digital Humanities (first published in 2004), methodologically, theoretically, and in terms of community practice. It explores digital humanities as an emerging discipline through changes in technology, as well as through evolving conceptions of the field, particularly through the lens of literary studies and new media. The article also explores how the field's major conference Digital Humanities , but previously titled the Joint International Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing (ACH/ALLC), reflects these changes, through not only the themes presented in conference papers, but in the change of the title of the conference itself.},
	language = {en},
	author = {Schreibman, Susan},
	pages = {14},
}

Digitale Geisteswissenschaften: Zentren und Peripherien«. This paper explores a history of humanities computing over the past decade as embodied in or represented by A Companion to Digital Humanities (first published in 2004), methodologically, theoretically, and in terms of community practice. It explores digital humanities as an emerging discipline through changes in technology, as well as through evolving conceptions of the field, particularly through the lens of literary studies and new media. The article also explores how the field's major conference Digital Humanities , but previously titled the Joint International Conference of the Association for Computers and the Humanities and the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing (ACH/ALLC), reflects these changes, through not only the themes presented in conference papers, but in the change of the title of the conference itself.

@article{liu_what_nodate,
	title = {What is the meaning of the digital humanities to the humanities?},
	volume = {128},
	url = {http://www.mlajournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409},
	abstract = {Yet even if we were to complete our hypothetical ethnographer’s chart [of the digital humanities], it would not adequately explain the digital humanities. This is because we would leave unexplained the relation of the digital humanities to the humanities generally. My thesis is that an understanding of the digital humanities can only rise to the level of an explanation if we see that the underlying issue is the disciplinary identity not of the digital humanities but of the humanities themselves. For the humanities, the digital humanities exceed (though they include) the functional role of instrument or service, the pioneer role of innovator, the ensemble role of an “additional field,” and even such faux-political roles assigned to new fields as challenger, reformer, and (less positively) fifth column.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2013},
	journal = {PMLA 128},
	author = {Liu, Alan},
	pages = {409--23},
}

Yet even if we were to complete our hypothetical ethnographer’s chart [of the digital humanities], it would not adequately explain the digital humanities. This is because we would leave unexplained the relation of the digital humanities to the humanities generally. My thesis is that an understanding of the digital humanities can only rise to the level of an explanation if we see that the underlying issue is the disciplinary identity not of the digital humanities but of the humanities themselves. For the humanities, the digital humanities exceed (though they include) the functional role of instrument or service, the pioneer role of innovator, the ensemble role of an “additional field,” and even such faux-political roles assigned to new fields as challenger, reformer, and (less positively) fifth column.